March 23, 2023

Useful links:,_Ukraine_and_the_Soviet_Union

Germany proper as the heart of Central Europe occupied the lands between Western Europe and Eastern Europe & Russia. It could also be regarded as situated between Northern(or northern-most) Europe and Southern Europe. Thus, it could radiate outwards in all directions(like the sun) or find itself caught between a rock and a hard place, surrounded by suspicious or outright hostile powers. The only other European entity with similar geo-political potential was Poland, especially during the peak period of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, but Polacks being Polacks, it collapsed under weak monarchs and petty noblemen(who trampled on the Slavic masses by partnering with Jews as middlemen and tax-collectors, whose excesses led to an explosion in Ukraine that sent shockwaves throughout the empire).

Unlike the lazy(and/or dumb) Polacks, Germans proved capable and even united as a ‘volk’ in national character and consciousness. If the Polish hierarchy had stuck-up Polish elites snubbing lower-tier Polacks who, thus neglected, ended up dumb and clueless, the German way cultivated a sharing of virtues and responsibilities from top to bottom, resulting in a talented ruling elite & managerial class, first-rate craftsman, hardworking merchants, industrious workers, and moralists/reformers.
Something of the Germanic character is conveyed in Henryk Sienkiewicz’s historical epic WITH FIRE AND SWORD. The Cossack rebels stumble upon a ship full of German mercenaries with a contractual obligation to the Polacks and present a counter-offer: Come over to the Cossack side and be rewarded handsomely. Germans mull it over but insist a contract is a contract, and they must first serve out their term before working for the Cossacks. Soon after, a battle ensues, and all the Germans are killed. The point is even the Polish-nationalist Sienkiewicz acknowledged something impressive about the German character. When Germans gave their word, it meant something.

Then, following national unification, it was no surprise to anyone that Germany had an outsized role in the coming century. Besides, not only was the German nation on the rise, even surpassing Great Britain in many fields, but the German populations spread out across the globe, especially in Russia and the United States, were making important contributions in their host countries. Clearly, the two big nations(or countries or empires) to watch at the dawn of the 20th century were America and Russia. Both were vast and bountiful with as yet untapped resources. Both had more than room enough to grow, or plenty of ‘lebensraum’. And both prized Germans as the gold-standard of immigrants and settlers.

Anglo-Americans, who founded the United States on awesome race-ism, naturally favored their racial cousins, the Germanic peoples: Germans, Dutch, and Scandinavians. And German immigrants were indeed a great asset in the development of America. Even today, areas settled by German(and/or Germanic) peoples are among the most pleasant parts in the United States. Germanics built cleaner and more orderly communities than most. Compare parts of Wisconsin(minus those ruined by blacks) with parts of Indiana and West Virginia settled by Scotch-Irish hillbillies. Compare areas settled by German immigrants to those settled by Slavic immigrants(and never mind the corrupt and criminal Italians, the kind in GOODFELLAS — honor among Italians isn’t about keeping your word but keeping your mouth shut).

And despite cold winters, what a wonderland Minnesota was before soul-hollowed cuck-maggots bent over backwards to the new god of Negrolatry pushed by Jewish Radical Racists. Even at the political level, communal German-Americans(and their ethnic cousins) ran better governments, certainly more so than the clannish Irish(with their big city machines) and the Italian hoodlums with their criminal culture.

Furthermore, the socialist-sympathies of large segments of German-Americans generally didn’t manifest as firebrand radicalism so common among Jewish immigrants from the Pale of Settlement, no more so than the religiously devout sectors of German-America with their piety, which tended to be inner-directed than outwardly aggressive; rather, both groups directed their focus and energy on running their own communities, just like German socialists at home generally preferred national reform than world revolution, which was more the obsession of Jewish radicals(who had little use for goy national identities). Indeed, Bismarck’s Germany led the way in nationalists(and even conservatives) working with Social-Democrats to provide safety-nets for the rapidly expanding rolls of urban dwellers and industrial workers.

Prior to World War I, if any ethnic group seemed primed for prominence in America, even at the expense of Anglo-Americans, it was the German-Americans(and other Germanics). Latin America had also taken notice in the 19th century and courted German immigrants(even from Russia) uber alles for their reputation for diligence, orderliness, and productivity(and relative lack of corruption compared to the Latins and local browns). Also, their ‘national character’, perceived as more communal than individualistic, suggested a higher likelihood of sociable camaraderie than ruthless competition, the feature of Anglo ‘cowboys’.

Pan-German-Demography did wonders not only for the US(and parts of Latin America). In many ways, Germans played an even more crucial role in the nascent modernization of Russia. If Anglos matched the Germans in (Protestant)Work Ethic, managerial ability, due diligence, and pragmatic reformism, Russians in the 19th century made Dumb Polacks seem like geniuses. Unlike the German elites who regarded Germans as national ‘volk'(or Anglo elites who regarded Anglo peoples as fellow citizens), Russian ruling class looked down upon their subjects as mental children or human cattle.

Instead of capitalizing on Russian potential and cultivating a domestic talent pool, the tendency(especially beginning with Peter the Great) was to import foreign talent for big tasks while using dimwit Russians to serve as beasts of burden, an attitude that persisted even after the Bolshevik Revolution, especially with the Trotskyite faction arguing for German Revolution on account of Russians being poor human material; this attitude seems internalized even to this day, what with the elites looking outward for guidance and investment, without which they fear Russia will sink back into a morass of inertia. (Some Western Marxists argued communism failed because it took on Russian characteristics that could only revert back to a kind of neo-Byzantine tsarism, thus snuffing out the flames of revolution.)

When Japan modernized, it learned from the West, but most of the talent was native and homegrown(even if educated in the West). In contrast, many involved in Russian modernization were non-Russians, especially the Germans who took on prominent roles in bureaucracy, military, industry, and trade. While Russian rulers appreciated and encouraged the full potential of non-Russian talent, they suppressed Russian potential with an attitude of paternal condescension, especially in cahoots with the moribund Orthodox Church that preached stoic acceptance of misery and subservience to the Tsar as a sentimental father-figure. In contrast, the German monarchy recognized the importance of educating/training the German masses to maximum potential in the new order. (Perhaps, Russian rulers wanted to have the cake and eat it too. They wanted a modern Russia but also a servile population. They feared ‘excessive’ reforms and education may turn the people restless, even rebellious against the status quo. Therefore, it was safer to import or outsource modernization to outsiders and minorities, much like ultra-conservative Arab monarchies do today. They keep their societies closed and hire foreign talent for modern tasks.)

That said, Russia could have done worse than with Germans at that crucial time in history. The most capable(and possibly conscientious) people on Continental Europe, Germans got the job done. Comparatively speaking, they were duty-and-honor-bound, mindful of reputation and good name. Russia’s considerable achievements were due in no small part to the contributions of Germans, many of whom assimilated into the Russian nation.

Now, imagine the interconnective, even ameliorative and conciliatory, role that Pan-Germania could have played in world affairs, with Germans and ethno-German minorities serving as a kind of bridge between the two great rising powers of the 20th Century, the US and Russia. The German case would have been different from that of the overseas Chinese as extension of Chinese dominance and that of the Irish diaspora as feisty sidekicks of the Anglos, as Ireland itself hardly constituted a great power. In contrast, Germany was destined to be a major power but not a superpower, and as such, Germans could maintain national sovereignty while also deferring to greater powers. Thus, German prestige and influence could have been a balance of national autonomy and international involvement.

Yuri Slezkine characterized the 20th century as the Jewish Century, but it could just as well have been the German Century, and in a way, despite the calamities of World War I and World War II, it was because Germany and Germans(especially in the US) did so much heavy-lifting in nation-building-and-managing. German-Americans, from generals to soldiers, not to mention all the engineers and educators, were surely one of the main pillars for America’s rapid rise to great power status. Besides, even many of the most consequential Jews were the products of German/Austrian cultures and systems of thought, even if in creative and/or destructive conflict with the ‘Aryans’. And, post-WWII European economic recovery would have been incomplete without West Germany as the main engine(and East Germany played an outsized role in the economy of the Eastern Bloc). Throughout the 20th century, German-Americans possibly contributed the most to American growth.

Indeed, before mass non-white immigration permanently transformed American demographics, German-Americans and other Germanics constituted the largest ethnic bloc. Anywhere in America one can readily notice the German Factor in towns and infrastructure, though degraded in some places by the influx of non-Germans, especially the Negroes from the South(or Somalia), and the degeneration of cultural values among all white groups, German-Americans included.

Especially following World War II, German-Americans became the Silent Ethnicity(just like West Germany became a Silent Power), diligently contributing to America but keeping a low profile as Nazism had become the Mark-of-Cain of German-ness, much like the the Yellow Star(or the Holocaust) became the hallmark of tragic Jewishness. For all their professional successes, things got increasingly problematic for German-Americans as Jews gained predominance and tirelessly rubbed the German nose in the Jewish ashes(while across the Atlantic, German children were weaned on guilt-milk of eternal damnation).

The turning point for German prestige can be traced back to World War I when the politics of Anglosphere, the combined conspiracy of the British Empire and the US, took a decisively anti-German turn, pressuring German populations to take the knee and assimilate as generic ‘good citizens’.
The German fate in Russia proved even more tragic with World War I, and the last real chance of rapprochement between Germany and Russia was squandered with Operation Barbarossa and the ensuing calamity, the most destructive war of nations ever. Of late, there was renewed talks of German-Russian economic partnership, especially via the Nord Stream pipelines, but recent events have shown Germany lacks the requisite agency and autonomy to push deals through on the basis of national interests, which means the plan was doomed from the start. (Besides, even if the plan had gone through, will the German nation even exist in fifty years when it’s ‘morally’ invested in the Great Replacement? To make things worse, German decline has been hastened in the past two decades with the ‘resettling’ of Jews who gleefully and sadistically take full advantage of their privilege vis-a-vis guilt-ridden Germans.)

The international role of Germany and Pan-Germania in the 20th Century need not have been (counter)hegemonic. Germany could have pursued peaceful relations with Russia, and furthermore, Russo-Germans could have smoothed ties between the two civilizations, especially as the economies of Germany and Russia were symbiotic(and still remain to this day). Besides, despite the occasional rash remark by Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany was poised for peaceful coexistence with the British Empire. Thus, Germany had much to gain via productive interaction with the biggest land power to the east and the biggest naval power to the west.

By and large, German immigrants in the US became law-abiding American citizens whose habits and values complemented those of the Anglos. With a powerful Germany at the heart of Europe and with peoples of German descent contributing to the US and Russia, Pan-Germania could have been the hardy spine of the global white order. Anglos had the pioneering(and individualistic) spirit in settling North America, and the Germans were an ideal rear-guard demography. And vast Russia, with its slothful and/or sloppy Slavs, had much to gain from the more industrious and/or meticulous German population. Imagine an inspired Pan-Germania from the Urals to the Rockies.

German contributions to modern education and nature-appreciation were positive and immense. The rise of the modern university is largely credited to the German model(though the kindergarten was a terrible idea that normalized the statist control of children at the youngest possible age), and German Romanticism rekindled man’s profound(and pagan) connection to nature(at odds with the Semitic-Biblical view of the world as ‘fallen’). German nature cult in its original incarnation was virile and soulful, unlike today’s Greens who are priggish, flaky, and decadent, not to mention hypocritical.

Why did Pan-Germania fail to materialize? Again, the most obvious answer is World War I, the modern era’s equivalent of the asteroid that doomed the dinosaurs(and profoundly altered the evolutionary trajectory of life on earth), not only because it was midwife to Bolshevism(that further antagonized the Germanic and Slavic worlds, though it might have been different if Germany also had gone communist) and the Great Depression that opened the path for National Socialism and World War II. (In contrast, the Napoleonic Wars were followed by a century of stability.) World War I traumatized the German World, within and outside Germany. It ruptured ties between Germany and Russia. Great Britain, increasingly anxious of rising Germany, used the war to ramp up anti-German hysteria to fever pitch, from which the Brits never quite outgrew.

And eventually, it impacted German-Americans who came under both political persecution and populist pressure to renounce their German loyalties, even heritage and identity(as all-things-German, even the names of foods, came under derision or attack). And with humiliation and defeat, effects of which were amplified by severe depression, the people of Germany were radicalized against moderation, some turning far-left(inspired by Bolshevism) and some turning arch-right. Eventually, National Socialists won over a substantial share of the industrialists, bourgeoisie, and the working class with a ‘creative’ fusion of economic leftism and cultural rightism. As an alchemy of rightist and leftist themes, National Socialism could have served as a formula for the world, especially because, unlike Italy, Germany had the means to be a great power, but it was not in the cards for two factors. National Socialism’s radical racism reeked of contempt for much of humanity, and its main perceived enemy, the Jews, held great sway over the Anglo World. (Though Soviet Union’s elites were disproportionately Jewish, Stalin’s word was final, as during the period of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, whereas the Anglo ‘democratic’ order couldn’t suppress Jewish pressures backed by vast financial resources and media power.)

National Socialism’s radical antisemitism roused World Jewry to ‘wage war on Germany’ via pressures on various governments against Germany(though not half-as-effectively as today when Jewish Demand is the West’s Command in a world of Jewish Masters and Goy Dogs), and Hitler’s own radical racialist worldview created what proved to be an unbridgeable gap between the ‘Aryan’ Germans and the ‘Asiatic’ Slavs(who happened to occupy the lands coveted by German Imperialism).

If Germans had peacefully settled across and contributed to the development of Russia and the Americas in the 19th century, Germany found itself at loggerheads with world powers in the 20th century, and German minorities came under suspicion and intense scrutiny in their host countries. Stalin was especially ruthless with ‘Volga Germans’ and ‘Baltic Germans’.

Then, after World War, especially with Jewish ascendency in the US, German culture-history-people became inseparable from Evil Nazism and Holocaust Guilt, leaving submission and atonement as the only recourse for survival and rehabilitation(which recent events have exposed as more craven obeisance than genuine remorse/conscience given current Germany’s arming of the Sub-Nazis in Ukraine against Russia, which was ravaged by the German onslaught in World War II and marked for slavery and/or genocide by Nazi ‘Aryan’ ideology; it now seems German Redemption was really predicated on cowardice before Jewish Power than true moral agency; Germans merely went from Brown-Shirts of the 1000 Yr Reich to Brownnosers to Forever Zion).

How might have history unfolded if National Socialism, like Italian Fascism, had steered clear of excessive antisemitism, working with pro-German Jews while targeting only the radicals and subversives? Then, an overt Anti-German campaign by World Jewry might have been averted, allowing Germany to build bridges with the great powers. The problem was that Jewish Power(excessively degenerate, criminal, and/or radical) had so degraded Germany during the Weimar Years — as certain Jewish-German elements were far more extreme and subversive than the Jews of Italy — that it was hardly surprising that National Socialism took shape as an Anti-Jewish movement. Besides, if Fascists came to power in Italy before the Bolsheviks showed their true colors under Stalin, National Socialism ascended with full knowledge of Soviet atrocities, in which Jewish radicals played a significant role. As Hitler noted, Soviet communism had finished off whatever vestiges of German presence that survived in Russia after World War I.

Still, it’s tantalizing to imagine what-might-have-been if Germany had taken a different course in the aftermath of the Great War. Prior to Germany’s fatal alliance with Imperial Japan, it played a key role in shoring up the KMT regime. Chiang Kai-Shek’s forces encircled and drove out the communists with the advice of German military experts. But Germany severed ties with China as it drew closer to Japan, which turned disastrous with the onrush of the Pacific War that finally turned majority American opinion against Germany as an ally of the ‘Japs’.
Everything turned to so tragic. In the earlier century, the German model was favored by the Japanese who valued its balance of tradition and transformation, authority and liberty. The German model also inspired other parts of the non-West that needed catching-up, not least because Germany itself had been a late-starter in national unity and industrialization.

During the Cold War, there was little chance of West Germany forging meaningful relations with the Soviet Union(aka the Evil Empire) as it was a member of NATO that, more or less, operated on Lord Hasting’s dictum: “Keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down”. As for East Germany, it symbolized communist repression than anything else in Western eyes. East Germany was a rump-state satellite of the Russians, and West Germany, for all its ‘economic miracle’, was politically ‘down’ and bereft of civilizational prestige. Things only got worse with Jewish preeminence in the US, especially as the Jew Taboo increasingly eroded European criticism of US policy.

Whereas Anglo elites, for all their disdain for the ‘irrational’ aspects of the ‘Teutonic’ character, tended to regard Germans(and Germanics) as racial brethren(deserving of forgiveness and a second chance), the Hyper-Semites were hellbent on implementing, even if in piecemeal manner, the original Morgenthau Plan of total German demolition(which we are witnessing today). As for Anglos in the UK and US, they are now so petrified of the accusation of leniency with Nazi Germans that they double down on their prostration before Jewish Power, with the ironic result of their unconditional support for the Jewish alliance with Sub-Nazi elements in Ukraine(LOL). The current Anglo-Cuck Narrative holds that Britain fought Germany to save the Jews from the Holocaust, a retrofitting of history if there ever was one. While it’s true that Jewish influence steered the UK against Germany, the Anglos then were still sufficiently powerful to pursue national and imperial interests over narrow Jewish ones.

Perhaps, the Pan-Germanic Promise/Project would have failed regardless of whether World War I happened or not. There could have been many other variables leading to the inevitable friction among national characters and the clash of empires. One thing for sure, the simultaneous rise of Pan-Germanism and Pan-Slavism made for darkening clouds over Germany and Russia. And, revanchist France just couldn’t let go of its crushing defeat to Prussia in 1871. Meanwhile, the British Empire grew alarmed by Germany’s rapid rise and growing ambition. If the French Empire was like a manageable mistress, Germany seemed like the new stud in town, and short on manners.

Historical speculations aside, it was World War I that decisively drove the wedge that destroyed the possibility of Pan-Germania. It led to Russian animus toward not only Germany but Russo-Germans and, in the Stalinist period, to forced mass-migrations of peoples of German stock, many of them perishing under harsh conditions in labor camps or some godforsaken wasteland. As for Germans in the UK and US, despite faring immeasurably better on the material level than the poor souls trapped in the Red Empire, the only option was assimilation at the expense of any meaningful German consciousness. Increasingly, German-ness had to stick to beer and pretzels.

Granted, it might have been different IF Germans were stronger in will and defiance, at least in the more liberal West, but the average German, in the home country and elsewhere, tended toward conformity and deference to authority. Despite the element of WILL as a central theme in German culture and philosophy, only a tiny fraction of Germans exhibited qualities of vision and drive. For every Ludwig van Beethoven, Richard Wagner, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, (half-Jewish) Fritz Lang, or Adolf Hitler, there were a thousand Germans who only knew obedience and consensus. Indeed, so many swarmed to Hitler’s great will because they lacked it themselves.

In contrast, one out of every five Jews has the defiant-gene, e.g. personalities like Lenny Bruce, Mel Brooks, Woody Allen, Howard Stern, Adam Sandler, Don Rickles, and Ron Jeremy(who even had the balls to suck his own dick). Ironically, Jews are less likely to live under a Nazi-like system for the simple reason that more of them are Hitler-like. If Germans produce a hundred sheep for every wolf, at least one out of every five Jew is a fierce weasel; therefore, Jews are less likely to abandon their agency to some would-be super-duper Jew, even Moses, which is why God had to step in and help out the prophet. Too many Jewish guys were baring their dongs and daring Moses to suck on it.

It explains why Jewish-Americans, unlike German-Americans once the US entered World War I, didn’t cave under pressure during the so-called ‘McCarthy Era’ when many of the Tribe came under suspicion for radical sympathies and subversive activities. Not only were Jews defiant but eventually managed to turn the tables and made Joe McCarthy akin to an American Hitler… though now, the Jewish regimen of Censchwarzship goes far beyond anything even conceived by so-called ‘red-baiters’.

Those who rather praise German-American behavior(as a pledge of patriotism) in the final year of World War I apparently subscribe to the assumption that Anglo-American elites, as the true standard-bearers of national policy, triumphantly imposed their norms for the sake of national pride and unity. But, from the vantage point of what transpired later(when Anglos caved to Jews as the New Normalizers), one could argue the Anglo-Americans merely won the contest of wills than of integrity with the German-Americans. After all, when Anglos were met with the stronger will-power of Jews(a far smaller minority than German-Americans) who demanded that Goy America assimilate to and appease Jewish Power than vice versa, they totally caved and now run around headless(and ball-less) as cucky white dogs of Zion.

Even if Anglo-Americans wielded the most levers of power in the early 20th century, German-American pride could have remained intact as among the Jews during the ‘McCarthy’ period. German-Americans just lacked the will. (Perhaps, one reason was German stoicism. While kvetching endlessly is part of Jewish culture, indeed even a matter of pride, most Germans would feel ashamed to be regarded as incessant complainers. In the Age of Complaint, the voices of the top three complainer groups, Jews-blacks-homos, are heard most. In the less vocal world of the pre-electronic era, stoicism was better appreciated as a virtue. But in the world of talking heads, those who do the most talking always win as even spoken nonsense is amplified over unspoken or muted truth. When Richard Nixon ran as the voice of the Silent Majority, his real message should have been ‘be silent no more’. These days, so-called ‘conservatives’ speak a lot more, especially with the rise of Talk Radio, but they still remain a selective-silent-majority-though-turning-into-a-minority because they continue to remain silent on the most crucial issue, the JQ.)

If German-Americans had shown greater defiance and will against the anti-Germanism so prevalent in the last years of World War I, they might eventually have prevailed over the Anglos. Sadly, most caved, just like the sheepish Japanese-Americans, many of whom volunteered to fight for the US that robbed them of property and tossed their families into ‘internment camps’. (If the US government rounded up Jews, dispossessed them, and sent them to ‘internment camps’, can you imagine Jews bending over backwards to prove their worth as ‘patriots’?)

In some ways, for all their nastiness, Jews are admirably made of tougher stuff because they aren’t so weak and wussy. The US had no business entering World War I, and German-Americans had every right to sympathize with their mother country, but the US waged a socio-cultural war on German-America, and the Germans caved like wussies. Shame!
Jews later demonstrated that Anglos are really pussies, i.e. if you push back hard enough amidst the adversity, they eventually crack and bow down before you. Just get a load of all these Anglo cucks rolling over before Jews in the UK, US, Canada, and Australia. All those groups that assimilated into the Anglosphere were fools because Jewish Power exposed Anglos to be a bunch of wheaks and whummies whose worldview now revolves around Judeo-centrism, no matter how ludicrous, like the current tranny craze. Today, assimilating to the Anglo Model means mindless cuckery to Jewish Supremacism, e.g. Rishi Sunak of the UK who emulates Anglo fellating of Jewish Power.

What were the deeper factors for Pan-Germania’s failure to materialize? Was there something inherently problematic in the German character, perhaps an ‘impossible’ combination of wild neo-barbarian romanticism and dutiful Protestant Work Ethic? Such an unlikely fusion of chaos and order may have seemed outlandish and threatening to others. It was one thing for the Brits to be restrained & efficient and for the Italians to be expressive & inefficient(and for the French to be somewhere in between), but how did the Germans manage to be both ‘irrational’ and ‘mechanistic’, a kind of a national clockwork-orange? So impassioned in music and so impressive in machinery? So unruly in spirit and so punctual in habit?

Britain as a nation of shopkeepers was led by a class of gentlemen. In contrast, Germany as a nation of craftsmen seemed led by intemperate bullies or madmen. Among the monarchs of his time, Wilhelm II was something of a firebrand. Though a first-rate diplomat and statesman, Otto von Bismarck was famous for his temper. It was as if German civilization, though outwardly advanced and industrial, remained pagan-barbarian at its core. Besides, the English language, though Germanic in origin and basic structure, had been softened by French-Latin influence whereas German retained much of the original character.

Now, if Germans were only wild and crazy, they would have been too disorderly to pose any real threat. Or, if they were only orderly, they would have been more temperate and predictable.
This combination of ‘beast’ and ‘machine’, like a tightknit Roman legion raging with barbarian soul, was something other civilizations couldn’t quite wrap their heads around(and still can’t on the evidence of all those books on Hitler and Nazism that still seek to understand). Germanism turned even Elmer Fudd into a frightful figure. And “The Ride of the Valkyries” in APOCALYPSE NOW drives even antiwar types into war frenzy.

Still, one could argue the German threat was greatly exaggerated, at least prior to the rise of Hitler. Germany prior to World War I had no plans of world domination. True, the Kaiser was an irascible egotist, but by and large, Germany simply wanted a role in the world commensurate to its power and prestige. The Anglosphere could easily have accommodated German ambitions instead of spinning into paranoia.

Anglos deserve a good deal of blame for the failure of the ‘Germanic Peace’ to serve as bridge from Russia to the Americas. Even with the outbreak of the Great War, the conflict could have been short-lived without intervention of Britain, which had no real dog in the fight, and things might have been patched up between Germany and other continental powers. The perennial British formula of preventing any dominant power in Continental Europe finally led to tragedy for all involved. To make things even worse, Anglo-American also got involved, creating a rift between Germany and German-America.

Russia too deserves its share of the blame. Tsar Nicholas’ reputation was already damaged as the result of the 1905 Russo-Japanese War. What was Russia doing picking a fight with Industrial Germany? And why form an alliance with France that had no concern for Russia, the modernization of which owed far more to the German element? And with all the problems within Russia itself, why play Big Daddy to Slavs everywhere, obligating Russia to intrude into minor conflicts that might have been easily resolved? (But then, short-sightedness is the bane of mankind. What were the Germans doing sending Lenin and other Bolsheviks into Russia to stir up trouble?)

And of course, the Jews had something to do with World War I, Bolshevism, Weimar degeneracy, Anglo foreign policy(not least through control of British and American politicians via purse-strings), World War II, and etc.
In the end, it was the Jews who came to play the pan-global role that the Germans could have. At one time, Jewish Power was prominent in both Russia and the US, as Yuri Slezkine detailed in THE JEWISH CENTURY. Many Jews looked to the Soviet Union as the first fulfillment of the Jewish dream of power, progress, and justice. Later, Jews leaned more toward America where their long-term success seemed more assured(whereas Jewish influence began to wane in the Soviet Union as egalitarianism naturally favored Slavic mediocrity over Jewish superiority).

Pound for pound, Jews are surely the most talented people in the world, but has Pan-Jewishism worked out well for the goyim? For all the endless fulminations about German ‘ubermensch’ supremacism(as part of Holocaust Remembrance), Jewish attitudes toward the Other seem more contemptuous, dismissive, and exploitative than any other. Also missing among Jews is the sense of noblesse oblige and honor, hardly surprising as the roots of Jewish ‘tribal character’ come Rabbinic Talmudism and merchant mentality, both obsessed with hoodwinking dimwit goyim as the devil’s spawn. Honor derives from warrior culture, something Jews have little experience of. (Today, many of the top US generals are Jewish, but they seem to be mere extensions of the Neocon cabal as few Jews will do the actual fighting and dying.)

A strain of Pietism molded the German conscience. Christianity, for all its hypocrisy, has emphasized compassion for all mankind, as well as reflection of one’s trespasses unto others, and Germans around the world played their part in reformist movements.
While many Jews also joined progressive movements, they often favored radicalism over reformism, justifying bloody revolutions that ended up doing more harm than good. And, most so-called Jewish Liberals turned out to be wolves-in-sheep’s-clothing who betrayed tolerance and liberty once the power was theirs.

When we survey the state of Pan-Judaica of the current world order, it is a kind of hell. What Jews did to Russia in the 1990s was truly unconscionable. What Jews are doing now with the war in Ukraine is one of the great evils of the 21st century. Jewish influence is leading to White Nakba all across Europe. And consider the state of the US under Jewish Supremacist rule that erected BLM-Negrolatry, Globo-Homo, and Jew-Worship as the ‘spiritual’ pillars of New America.

A proud and confident Pan-Germania might have countered the worst excesses of Pan-Judaica, but the double whammy of World War I and World War II ended that possibility. (To be sure, so much of 20th century tragedy could be interpreted as a conflagration arising from the friction of Teutonism and Semitism in creativity and hostility.) Broken in will and hollowed of soul after World War II, Germans at home and abroad only knew how to take care and take orders. Germans became phobic of their own nature and soul in their earnest efforts at rehabilitation and redemption, a people always out on parole but never truly free.

If indeed Germans were entirely evil and Jews entirely innocent in the Nazi Period, this would be understandable. In truth, the WWII era was really about German supremacism vs Jewish supremacism, and whereas the former was totally crushed in the war, the latter has only grown more pathological with the Holocaust Narrative as moral shield. Thus, German goodwill can only be exploited than appreciated, which is why Jews are now demanding that Germans, who expended so much time and energy expunging themselves of their Nazi past, send more arms, such as Panzer tanks, to Sub-Nazi elements in Ukraine allied to Jewish Gangster-Supremacists.

As for the Anglos, they’ve been proven to be a hollow and soulless bunch whose entire civilization actually ran on fumes of snotty status, haughty manners, and glib wit. Theirs was a wit-to-power, not a will-to-power, and when met with superior Jewish wit and will, the Anglos folded fast and now cuck to every Jewish demand. What might have been, the promise of Pan-Germania, was lost forever.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *